Quite the slate of games this past weekend, huh?
First of all, prop results from Saturday:
Stafford UNDER 33.5 passing attempts -106 (DK) 1.5 units.
LOSS, 42 attempts. This play assumed LAR would be holding a lead late and running a ton. CAR has a bottom 10 rushing defense, too. I liked this play and still think it was +EV. -1.59u.
Kyren Williams OVER 68.5 rushing yards -112 (FD)
LOSS, 57 yards. Absolutely no idea how this didn't cash as he averaged a chunky 4.4 yards per rush with 13 attempts. He was gashing them every run it seemed but LAR relied heavily on their pass game for most of the day, especially late. Going 3/13 on third downs was one of the big reasons this game was as close as it was. I needed about 3 more touches for Kyren. -1.12u.
Blake Corum OVER 42.5 rushing yards -112 (DK) (half unit). (This is a bit of a hedge to the Kyren bet. I like these two combined).
WIN, 45 yards. Glad I threw this in as a sort of Kyren hedge. Again, CAR is pretty bad against the run. +.5u.
Bryce Young OVER .5 INT -126 (DK)
WIN, 1 INT. This could have been 1.5 units as the edge was pretty decent. +1u.
Bryce Young OVER 1.5 TD's +185 (DK)
LOSS, 1 TD. If you knew Young was going to throw it 40 times and CAR would end up with 31 points, you'd for sure think this bet would cash. -1u.
Kyren Williams OVER 14.5 rush attempts -113 (DK)
LOSS, 13 attempts. I could have cashed this out profitably in the first half as LAR was feeding him and he was gashing. But they went air heavy in the second half especially. -1.13u.
Stafford OVER 255.5 yards -112 (FD)
WIN, 304 yards. Never in doubt, really. +1u.
Parlay: B Young over .5 pass TD and over .5 INT +140 (PPH) (half unit)
Nice little square looking win. This probably should have been a full unit. +.7u.
And a nice little First Quarter semi middle with Stafford under 64.5 yards -114 (DK) and over 60.5 -115 (FD). Under = 2 units. Over = 1 unit.
LOSS of 1.3 units. 67 yards! So close. Not exactly sure if this was profitable in hindsight but I think it was. I usually look for prop middles like this to be at least 10%. For instance, over 100 yards and under 110 yards. This was only about 6.5% but with it being only a quarter of the game, I think it was a good middle. The very last play of the first quarter was a 15 yard pass from Stafford to Parkinson. If he gets tackled 2.5 to 6.5 yards shorter, we bink. Oh well! -1.3u
Little first half CP action: Car +6.5, under 23.5 +180 (FD)
LOSS, although Fan Duel had a couple very arb-able alt first half lines of +6.5 and +3.5 which I unloaded on which all won. -1u.
All in all -2.94 units on props, not counting the first half CP. So I guess -3.94 units total but the CP was tiny.
These all 'felt' really good and I don't even regret betting them. I think long term altogether they were +EV. However, I've 'felt' this way about my props for like 5 years now and have been break even with props at absolute best. I'll probably do this again for a few more games and I would like to get in the green for NFL playoff props in total but we shall see. Really depends on if I have the time but with so few games remaining, I think I will. I saw some things in prop land that I haven't before and I had some ideas flowing. But, whatever! Props are just not quite my jam anymore. You DFS fucks ruined the whole godamn thing. *Mike Ehrmantraut from Breaking Bad: 'We had a good thing you stupid son of a bitch!'*
I had an OK week in total. I lost about 3 units overall but I have the last leg of a massive teaser pending tonight (PIT +8.5). [I wrote most of this Monday]. I can lock up more than 12 units if I go with straight arbs, but with the super low total (38) I'll definitely go with some middles. Depends what I can get on HOU.
I managed to get both sides of Wonging JAX/BUF for big amounts which was good. I had to use PHI +.5 as a leg for a lot of my teasers which obviously lost. That wasn't a great leg anyway so I fully hedged it with SF ML, SF -2.5 and some SF +3.5. If PHI won by 3 or less it would have been perfect.
Looking ahead, SEA and DEN look like juicy Wongable games. My PPH has DEN +1 so I'll be watching that close, looking to snipe a +1.5 teased up to +7.5.
Random football thoughts:
-Why do O-Lines telegraph the snap so much these days? It seems like nearly every game I see, the Guard throws his arm up so the center can see it, then the center snaps the ball. Every single snap. Or, like Tony Romo used to be famous for, snapping it with 1 second left on the play clock in nearly every single situation. It lets the defense really tee up. I know with Romo it was more to see as much of the defense pre snap as possible, but that isn't the case with what I see these days. I especially noticed it last night with the Chargers. Every play the Guard looks back at the QB, waves his hand near the centers face, then they snap it, essentially giving the defense a count down to the snap. Doesn't that seem stupid? And if you are going to do that, how do you not put a couple fakes in mid game? Like, establish that that is your pattern, then on a have-to-have it down, you have the guard wave his hand and then NOT snap it right then? Or quick snap it with no hand wave? Where's the deception? Similarly, every single QB has a pre-snap cadence. You can probably hear some of them in your head right now. I feel like I never hear them use that to their advantage. Establish your cadence, use it every single down, but then mid game change it up. I think Aaron Rodgers does shit like that but I don't think anyone else does. Curious!
-Another similar thing that has always bugged me is on field goal defenses. I see this all the time and it's so obvious that I think I must be missing something. Say an offense is lining up to a kick a field goal where there is a zero percent chance that they're going to run a fake. Something like 4th and 20 on the 35 yard line, down by 2 with 1 second left in the game. It doesn't even have to be that dramatic but let's use that as an example. ZERO chance that the offense is doing anything other than kicking the field goal. You'll see two, sometimes three players on defense drop back to defend the possible fake. I know there are rules for rushing/blocking a kick, but can't you line up guys on the outside of the formation to rush? I know you can't jump over the center anymore (which is gay) and you can't use leverage, but I don't think there are rules dictating how many guys can rush the line. (I just spent 20 minutes trying to look this up online but can't find anything). I've seen literally Super Bowl game winning kicks with no time left on the clock with 2 or 3 guys on defense basically dropping back into coverage. Again, curious!
Random non-football thoughts:
-I saw an absolutely filthy hockey highlight the other day from womens hockey, actually. Abbey Murphy, who plays for Minnesota and who was recently named to the Olympic team, made a big brain play that was as unique and smart as it was athletic. To be honest and with recency bias in mind, I have to say that it was one of the best hockey assists I think I have ever seen. This article has a 12 second slow motion replay of it, but seeing it full speed and at a couple different angles is worth it. Actually, this video is even better. If you can't watch it, real quick, she's skating into the offensive zone with the puck on a 2 on 1. With the defender right in front of her, she flicks the puck up in the air, bats it down lacrosse style through the defenseman's legs, gathers it back on her stick and dishes it across to her teammate who buries it. Nasty. (Speaking of women and hockey, it is still so incredibly jarring to me when I put on an NHL game and hear a woman commenting. Let's be honest: it sucks. And who is it for, exactly? I don't even believe that the 8 women watching hockey on their own like it. Do girls want straight men giving running commentary during something like a Victorias Secret fashion show? If everything is for everyone then it's really for nobody).
-I came across a video and a guy recently that I liked so much, I have to share. His name is Benjamin Zander and he's a pretty famous conductor. He's currently the musical director of the Boston Philharmonic Orchestra and the Boston Philharmonic Youth Orchestra. He's given Ted Talks and I guess if you're into classical music you probably know about him. Well, he does these things where he takes a student playing their instrument in front of a small audience and he walks them through their performance, giving all kinds of insight into the song and music and even life in general. I've watched a bunch of his videos now and they're all incredible. However, one really stuck out to me. It's from 10 years ago and has over a million views on Youtube. Here it is. Seriously, do yourself a favor and watch it. (Start watching it at 5:30 the first time you watch it as the first 5 minutes is the student playing the song by himself. The magic happens when Zander gets involved). I've been a musician my whole life (guitar and drums) but even if you aren't one, it is still for sure worth watching. Seriously, I've watched this video now 5 times. Besides the song being awesome on its own (I'm kind of starting to get into classical music a little bit now?), you just gotta see how passionate and knowledgeable this guy is. It's hard to explain. If you trust my taste at all at this point, watch the video. His TED talk is worth a watch too.
-I watched a documentary on Netflix recently called 'In Waves and War.' It was about soldiers, PTSD and mushroom therapy (I'm still holding my mushroom stocks like a shroom-cuck at this point). It was an OK doc, I suppose worth watching. Right on the edge of being worth it actually. But something really stood out to me. This is not going to sound great and I debated even bringing this up but bear with me here for a minute. The basic gist of the doc is a group of veterans who are all really struggling with PTSD and depression and adjusting to life back home. These are real deal, in combat Navy Seal dudes. They take Ibogaine which is basically magic mushrooms and it immensely helps them, short and long term. Besides giving me some much needed confidence in my Cybin, MindMed, and Compass stock positions, I had something of a surprising reaction. I found myself sort of really not liking these guys. Not in an anti-military way at all, but there was almost something, dare I say, fake about them? Like they were just way too into being soldiers and maybe too into being wounded soldiers? (I told you this wasn't going to sound good.) They were all so unbelievably impressed with themselves but also looked to be desperate for you to be impressed. Plus it was like they were impressed at themselves for not being impressed by themselves, even though they clearly were. They all viewed themselves as professional soldiers, almost like comic book hero's, and seemingly nothing else. The way they talked about their trauma and their wounds and the shit they went through was in this weird way whey they almost seemed to like it? And there was a thing where they acted like they didn't want to talk about it but they clearly loved every minute of it. And part of me couldn't help think something like 'you know, thanks and everything, genuinely, but no one made you do any of this. No one even really asked...?' (I'm whispering and gingerly taking baby steps here). I've seen a lot of WW2 docs and those guys were like night and day with these guys. I remember one WW2 pilot veteran was talking about seeing an enemy shooting at paratroopers. He says "I circled around and opened up on him. That was the end of that" just super nonchalant and not trying appear nonchalant.
I was thinking about it because I think we're all missing something. Some sort of deeper connection, a purpose and identity inside ourselves. With these soldiers in the doc, it was like if they weren't soldiers then they were nothing. Like there was nothing in or about them that wasn't 'soldier'. I get that they were all fucked up for real but one guy was screaming 'get the fuck away from me!' at his wife and kids while watching war videos in his garage with a whiskey and a gun in his hand. It was almost like they were acting. (Just to be clear here, I do have immense respect for anyone who sees any kind of actual combat. I know as much as anyone that we need walls and protectors and one of my favorite quotes of all time is "people sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.") So I'm really not talking about veterans in general here. I'm talking more about the lack of anything in these soldiers other than 'SOLDIER'. And I know that obviously these guys don't pick their missions, but so much war and mayhem over the past 25 years has been for murky and nebulous and even nefarious reasons. Fucking oil pipe lines and Haliburton stock. It almost made me want to say 'hey man, just go skydiving or race cars or something.' Ya know. If it's going to make you want to kill your family, like, just do something else maybe?
I don't even know what the fuck point I'm trying to make here exactly. A semi-professional gambler who grew up on a cul de sac weighing in on Navy Seal combat veterans being just a bit too into themselves, lol. I told you it wasn't gonna sound great. But something about the guys in that doc was off-putting in an awfully strange way and I've never had that feeling watching something like that before. Usually when I watch war docs like this, I'm halfway standing at attention with a crisp salute and misty eyes. But in this one I couldn't help but feel like saying 'we will all be okay if you guys just become personal trainers or downhill mountain bike riders, especially if it means you don't threaten to Chris Watts your wife and two little kids. The Lockheed stock ain't that important.' It made me think of what a waste it is to use up men like that, too. Fierce, loyal, super competent warriors destroying their lives and their families lives for, ultimately, what? Soldiers and symptoms of a sick, dying, hollow, late state regime perhaps.
We'll end here on this happy note. Check back soon, lots of action coming up.